Women in Business Law Awards Europe 2020
The 2020 finalists for the Women in Business Law Awards Europe awards were announced on 16 July 2020 by Euromoney Legal Media Group.
We are proud to share the news that Isabella Hartung, who heads the antitrust/competition law team of Barnert Egermann Illigasch, figures on the shortlist for the Women in Business Law Awards Europe in the category "Best in Competition and Antitrust".
Furthermore, Barnert Egermann Illigasch is shortlisted in the category "Jurisdiction Awards" for Austria.
The Women in Business Law Europe Awards celebrate firms for their efforts to drive success for women in the legal profession. Lawyers from across a spectrum of practice areas and jurisdictions are represented on the shortlist.
Individual winners are judged on their professional accomplishments as well as advocacy and influence within her field. Firm and country winners are judged on their ability to support the development of women in the legal profession.
The awards winners will be announced on 10 September 2020.
FDI Screening in Austria: The Investment Control Act
The Investment Control Act (Investitionskontrollgesetz, Federal Gazette I 87/2020; "InvKG") came into force on 24 July 2020. Investment control in Austria, which has so far lived a shadowy existence in Section 25a of the Austrian Foreign Trade and Payments Act (Außenwirtschaftsgesetz; "AußWG"), is now subject to an entirely new regime. The InvKG aims to strengthen the clout of Austrian FDI control. As in the past, investments by persons and entities from foreign countries (outside the EU, EEA and Switzerland) that could pose a threat to security or public order can be prevented by means of an approval procedure. In particular, the new act provides for the following tightenings and new regulations:
- Lower Threshold: Under Section 25a AußWG, a share in voting rights of at least 25% triggered an obligation to apply for approval. Under the new InvKG, for certain conclusively defined, particularly sensitive areas, the obligation to apply for approval is already triggered by the acquisition of a share in voting rights of only 10%. Areas such as defence equipment, water and the operation of energy or digital infrastructure are regarded as particularly sensitive. Research and development in the areas of pharmaceuticals, vaccines, medical devices and personal protective equipment is also subject to the lowered threshold until 31 December 2022.
- Obligation to obtain approval for indirect acquisitions: According to Section 25a AußWG, indirect acquisitions by foreign persons through a non-foreign acquiring entity were only subject to FDI screening approval if such acquisition structure is chosen to circumvent FDI screening regulations. Under the InvKG, indirect acquisitions by foreign persons are now generally covered by approval requirements. Thus, it has to be analysed who actually gains influence in the target company through the planned acquisition. According to the explanatory notes to the government bill, this is to be assessed on the basis of the true economic substance of the transaction. To determine the ultimate controlling shareholder, the Investment Control Act refers to the Austrian Economic Owners Register Act (Wirtschaftliche Eigentümer Registergesetz).
- Timing of the application: Section 25a AußWG obliged the acquirer to submit the application for approval prior to signing. The new InvKG defers the date by which the application must be submitted to the leading competent member of the Federal Government (currently the Federal Minister for Digital and Economic Affairs) to immediately after signing. Also, in the case of public offers, applications have to be filed after the decision to submit a public offer is published (by contrast, the ministerial draft provided for an obligation to submit the application before publication of the decision to submit the offer). Closing may not be carried out before an approval is granted or the relevant deadlines have expired.
- Subsidiary obligation of the target company: The new act only provides for a subsidiary obligation of the target company to notify (instead of an obligation to obtain approval). The target company may immediately notify the acquisition in writing if it becomes aware of an intended acquisition requiring approval and the target received no information about an application for approval.
- Initiation of approval proceedings ex officio: Section 8 InvKG enables the competent Federal Minister to initiate an approval proceeding ex officio if no application has been made for a transaction requiring approval. If the relevant transaction has already been closed, it is possible to impose subsequent conditions or even order the unwinding of the transaction.
- Certificate of non-objection: If potential applicants are not certain whether an approval is required for a particular transaction, they can apply for a certificate of non-objection under the InvKG. An application for such certificate must include all the information contained in a standard FDI screening notification. If the competent Federal Minister determines that no certificate of non-objection can be issued because the transaction is subject to approval, no subsequent application for approval is required and the applicant is informed of the initiation of an approval procedure.
- Criminal liability: Violations of the provisions of the InvKG are punishable by criminal law, as were violations of Section 25a AußWG. However, the maximum prison sentence for violations is reduced to up to one year or, for certain serious violations, to up to three years.
- Coordination within the EU: From 11 October 2020, Regulation (EU) 2019/452 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investment into the Union (FDI Screening Regulation; OJ L 79I) will be applicable. The regulation establishes mechanisms for cooperation and information exchange between the individual Member States and the Commission. Chapter 3 of the InvKG creates the necessary preconditions for this cooperation in Austria.
Contact: Isabella Hartung, E: email@example.com
Barnert Egermann Illigasch advised EnBW on joint venture for Austrian charging stations
BEIRA Corona Task Force Update
Overview of legal measures to mitigate the financial impact of the Coronavirus crisis on companies (as per 5 May 2020)
The Austrian legislator has continued to react to the "COVID-19" pandemic, in order to, inter alia, restart the operation of courts and administrative authorities. Therefore, thirteen legislative packages, the 6th to 18th COVID-19 Act, were introduced by the government in the National Council on 28 April 2020 and subsequently passed.
Existing measures, which we discussed in our overview of 17 March 2020 and in the updates of 20 March 2020, 27 March 2020 and 10 April 2020, remain in place and are only amended or supplemented by the new COVID-19 Acts. The following is an overview of relevant measures implemented by the new legislative packages.
ASSISTANCE MEASURES FOR AFFECTED COMPANIES
COVID-19 Assistance Fund
Within the framework of the 18th COVID-19 Act, the legislator amended, inter alia, the ABBAG Act, stipulating that in connection with financial measures pursuant to Section 2 paragraph 2 number 7 of the ABBAG Act (i.e., guarantees, direct loans or direct grants from the COVID 19 Assistance Fund) (i) non-assignment clauses in favour of the financing bank or funding agency have a binding effect on all third parties and (ii) liabilities assumed by ABBAG or COFAG are not subject to the written form requirement (which otherwise applies to sureties/liabilities).
COVID-19 Aid Audit Act
In addition, within the framework of the 18th COVID-19 Act, the legislator enacted the COVID-19 Aid Audit Act, which regulates in detail the requirements for the tax offices (as appraisers and not as tax authorities) for the subsequent audit of state aid measures received from the COVID 19 Assistance Fund, the COVID-19 Hardship Fund or from short-time work subsidies.
Within the framework of the 16th COVID-19 Act, the legislator amended the Epidemics Act, inter alia, by granting the Minister of Health a statutory power to regulate the calculation of the amount of compensation or remuneration for loss of earnings under the Epidemics Act in order to ensure uniform administrative management by the district administrative authorities throughout Austria.
In addition, the legislator attempted to clarify the powers of public authorities in the area of the Epidemics Act, according to which regulations covering the entire territory of Austria are to be issued by the Minister of Health. Conflicting regulations of state governors or district administrative authorities shall then cease to be effective unless otherwise stipulated in the respective regulation by the Minister of Health.
The relevance of this clarification is at least questionable, since it only refers to regulations issued by the Minister of Health under the Epidemics Act, whereas the previous COVID-19 regulations were not issued under the Epidemics Act, but under the specially created COVID 19 Measures Act.
PROCEDURES AND DEADLINES
Civil Court Procedures
Within the framework of the 8th COVID-19 Act, the legislator has, inter alia, recast Section 3 of the 1st Act on supporting measures to COVID-19 in the justice system. Now the law provides that until the end of 2020, hearings in civil court procedures can be held without the personal presence of the parties or their representatives by means of suitable technical means of communication for word and image transmission (e.g. by means of video conferences) if the parties consent thereto. However, the parties' consent shall be deemed to have been given if they do not object within a period of time set by the court.
In certain proceedings (hospitalisation, nursing home residence and adult protection cases as well as proceedings under the Tuberculosis Act and the Epidemics Act) the parties' consent is not required at all.
All parties, witnesses, experts, interpreters and other persons to be called upon may also request to participate in the proceedings by suitable technical means of communication if they certify an increased health risk posed by COVID-19 for themselves or for persons with whom they are necessarily in contact, be it privately or professionally.
If a party or a witness does not have suitable technical means of communication at its disposal, such party not represented by an attorney may request adjournment, such party represented by an attorney and such witness may request provisional refrainment from questioning. In any case, according to the legal materials, no person is required to acquire suitable technical means of communication.
The revised provision also regulates some technical matters related to the minutes of the court hearing, the costs and the conclusion of (out-of-court) settlements.
Finally, special provisions are laid down for enforcement and insolvency proceedings, according to which the parties' consent to hold court hearings in such proceedings by way of video conferences is not required; however, persons to be heard or to be present at such hearings may, within one week of service of the summons, certify that they do not have the suitable technical means of communication. This would prevent the holding of a hearing, questioning, creditors' meeting or creditors' committee meeting.
The legislator has laid down similar rules for administrative procedures in the 12th COVID-19 Act, which, inter alia, recasts Section 3 of the COVID-19 Act on supporting measures to COVID-19 in administrative law.
For example, official acts may only be performed in the presence of more than one other person if a distance of at least one meter can be maintained between the persons present. Persons who do not wear a mouth and nose protector can be excluded from official acts. The public authority may also conduct hearings, questionings, inspections, taking of evidence or similar acts using suitable technical means of communication for the transmission of words and images (e.g. by means of video conferences).
The parties and other persons involved, witnesses, experts, interpreters and other persons to be called upon to participate in an official act have to be given the opportunity to participate using suitable technical means of communication. If no suitable technical means of communication are available to them, the official act may be performed in their absence, in which case they shall be given the opportunity to exercise their rights or to participate in establishing the facts of the case in other suitable ways (including the possibility of raising objections at a later date).
Our specialists with the respective expertise are at your disposal.
BEIRA Corona Task Force Update
Overview of legal measures to mitigate the financial impact of the Coronavirus crisis on companies (as per 10 April 2020)
The Austrian legislator has continued to react to the "COVID-19" pandemic, in order to, inter alia, mitigate the crisis' impact on companies. Therefore, three legislative packages, the 3rd, 4th and 5th COVID-19 Act, were introduced by the government in parliament on 2 April 2020. They passed the legislative process and were published on 4 April 2020. Existing measures, which we discussed in our overview of 17 March 2020 and in the updates of 20 March 2020 and 27 March 2020, remain in place. The following is an overview of relevant measures implemented by the three new legislative packages.
ASSISTANCE MEASURES FOR AFFECTED COMPANIES
Crisis Management Fund
The "COVID-19 Crisis Management Fund", which was set up by the first package of measures at the Federal Minister of Finance to provide the necessary financial resources to cope with the Coronavirus crisis situation (see overview of 17 March 2020), has been increased from 4 billion to 28 billion euros. The fund will continue to provide financial resources for stabilising the liquidity of companies.
To implement the COVID-19 Crisis Management Fund, the limited liability company "COVID-19 Finanzierungsagentur des Bundes GmbH" ("COFAG") was established as a subsidiary of the stock company "Abbaubeteiligungsaktiengesellschaft des Bundes" (ABBAG). COFAG will be provided with sufficient financial resources from federal funds. On 8 April 2020, the Federal Ministry of Finance published the "Guidelines on adopting financial measures required to maintain the solvency and bridge liquidity difficulties of companies in connection with the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen and the economic effects caused by it" as a regulation. The substantive guidelines (the "Guidelines") are set out in the annex to this regulation. The Guidelines stipulate how financial measures in the form of guarantees, direct loans and direct grants are to be implemented to maintain the solvency of enterprises and to bridge their liquidity difficulties caused by economic effects resulting from the spread of COVID-19. They shall apply to financial measures applied for until 31 December 2020.
The Guidelines clarify that only companies which (i) are headquartered or maintain a permanent establishment in Austria and (ii) carry out a significant operational activity in Austria shall be granted financial measures as defined in the Guidelines. Excluded from the granting of financial measures are supervised legal entities in the financial sector, in particular credit institutions pursuant to the Austrian Banking Act (BWG), insurance companies pursuant to the Austrian Insurance Supervision Act 2016 (VAG 2016), investment firms and investment service providers pursuant to the Austrian Securities Supervision Act 2018 (WAG 2018) and pension funds pursuant to the Austrian Pension Fund Act (PKG). Furthermore, financial measures may not be granted to "firms in difficulty". These are companies to which at least one of the following characteristics applies:
- In the case of a limited liability company (GmbH), if more than half of the subscribed share capital has been lost due to accumulated losses;
- In the case of entities (partnerships) where at least some partners bear unlimited liability for the debts of the entity, if more than half of the equity capital reported in the company accounts has been lost as a result of accumulated losses;
- If the company is in ongoing insolvency proceedings or the conditions for the opening of such proceedings are met;
- If the company has received rescue aid or restructuring aid and the company still has obligations stemming from such aid; or
- In the case of a company which is not an SME, if in the last two years the company's book value-based debt-equity ratio was more than 7.5 and interest coverage ratio calculated based on its EBITDA was less than 1.0.
There are certain special rules for SMEs that have been in existence for less than three years, or, in the case of risk financing aid, in the seven years following their first commercial sale.
COFAG's choice of financial measures must be based on whether the company is likely able to repay the funds needed to cover its liquidity requirements within a reasonable time during normal course of business. If this is not the case, (only) the financial measure of direct grants is available (see below).
Applications must be submitted to the entity designated by COFAG (such as OeKB or AWS) via the respective principal bank; the relevant forms provided by COFAG must be used.
If financial measures are applied for and granted, the applicant is obliged to, inter alia, ensure that withdrawals by the owner of the company or the distribution of profits to shareholders/owners are in accordance with the economic circumstances during the term of the financial measure. This includes a ban on dividends and profit distributions from 16 March 2020 to 16 March 2021 and a "moderate dividend and profit distribution policy" for the remaining term of the financial measure. The liquidity from the financial measure may not be used for stock/share buybacks or for the payment of bonuses to board members or managing directors.
The financial measures should not be used to repay existing financing (ie debt restructuring), except for the payment of individual loan instalments or interest on their respective due dates as contractually agreed as of the date the COVID-19 Act came into force. However, the exemption does not cover such payments in the case of prepayment, acceleration or at final maturity.
The applications shall be examined by COFAG, which may instruct OeKB, AWS or other authorised representatives to assess the applications and make a recommendation to COFAG. According to the Guidelines, COFAG does not have to justify its decision and there is no legal claim to the granting of financial measures.
Federal Hardship Fund
The Federal Hardship Fund, which was subject to changes in each of the prior measure packages, will be topped up from a maximum amount of 1 billion euros to a maximum amount of 2 billion euros. Its funding will be provided via the COVID-19 Crisis Management Fund. The Federal Hardship Fund is intended to mitigate hardship cases caused by legal and economic consequences of COVID-19 among individual entrepreneurs, freelancers, NPOs and micro-enterprises.
It has now been clarified that so-called "new self-employed persons" fall within the group of recipients of the Federal Hardship Fund. If necessary, the Federal Minister of Finance may channel further funds into the Federal Hardship Fund. The criteria according to which the means are to be distributed are to be laid down in a specific regulation by the Federal Minister of Finance; the Austrian Federal Chamber of Commerce (Wirtschaftskammer Österreich) will continue to process the applications to the Federal Hardship Fund.
Fixed Cost Subsidy
Companies whose revenues declined by at least 40% due to the COVID-19 crisis can receive tax-free and non-repayable subsidies for certain fixed costs, such as rent, insurance premiums, interest expenses, contractual payment obligations (which are non-cancellable/non-reducible and necessary for operations), as well as license, electricity, gas and telecommunications costs. Further, an appropriate entrepreneurial salary in the maximum amount of 2,000 euros per month, as well as a loss in value of perishable/seasonal goods of more than 50%, can be the basis of the fixed cost subsidy.
Eligible are companies whose location and business activities are in Austria, and which operationally incurred the relevant fixed costs in Austria. The companies must have taken all reasonable measures to reduce the fixed costs and maintain jobs in Austria.
The fixed cost subsidy is staggered and depends on the loss of revenue of the company; in case of 40-60% revenue loss, the compensation amounts to 25% of the fixed costs as defined above, in case of 60-80% revenue loss it amounts to 50% and in case of 80-100% revenue loss it amounts to 75% of the relevant fixed costs.
The slump in revenues and the amount of the relevant fixed costs have (subsequently) to be confirmed by a tax consultant or an auditor. After the end of the current fiscal year and determination of the damage, the subsidy is paid out (capped with 90 million euros per company).
Excluded from the fixed cost subsidy are companies that employed more than 250 people as of 31 December 2019 and have laid off employees after the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis instead of using the option of short-time work. The entire finance and insurance sectors are also excluded.
The fixed cost subsidy does not have to be repaid – subject to the amounts of revenues and fixed costs having been correctly stated. The fixed cost subsidy is not subject to tax but reduces the corresponding deductible expenses for the relevant fiscal year.
All subsidies such as cash grants, loans, guarantees and contributions in kind are to be entered into the transparency register in accordance with the 3rd COVID-19 Act in order to obtain an overview of the benefits granted in connection with the COVID-19 crisis.
If a tenant of an apartment (in full or partly) fails to pay rent due in the period from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020 because his/her economic capacity has been significantly impaired as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the landlord may not terminate the lease or demand its annulment under sec 1118 of the Austrian General Civil Code (ABGB) solely because of this payment default. Furthermore, the landlord may neither claim the due but unpaid rent in court until 31 December 2020 nor recover it from a deposit handed over by the tenant.
Any fixed-term residential rental agreement subject to the Austrian Tenancy Act (Mietrechtsgesetz) which expires after 30 March 2020 and before 1 July 2020 may, in deviation from the otherwise applicable minimum contract term, be extended in writing until the end of 31 December 2020 or for a shorter period.
Current Loans of Micro-Enterprises and Consumers
The 2nd Act on supporting measures to COVID-19 in the justice system (as part of the 4th COVID-19 Act) provides, inter alia, for easements to some borrowers. The following measures apply to loan agreements concluded with consumers or micro-enterprises before 15 March 2020:
- Any claims of the lender for repayment, interest or principal instalments due between 1 April 2020 and 30 June 2020 shall be deferred for a period of three months from the due date, if the borrower, as a result of the exceptional circumstances caused by the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, suffers a loss of income which makes it unreasonable to expect performance of his/her contractual obligations. It is unreasonable to expect borrowers to perform their contractual obligations if, in particular, their reasonable livelihood or the reasonable livelihood of their dependants is at risk. In the case of micro-enterprises, a precondition is that the enterprise can either not provide the services due to circumstances attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic at all or would not be able to provide the services without jeopardising the economic basis of its business.
- Termination by the lender due to late payment or significant deterioration of the borrower's financial situation is excluded until the deferral expires. The parties may not deviate from this rule to the detriment of the consumer.
- Any term after which expiry the utilisation of collateral provided for the deferred obligation is no longer permitted will be extended for such a period that the lender may utilise the collateral after the last due date of the secured obligations for a period that corresponds to the initial contractual arrangements.
Insofar as deviations to the detriment of the borrower are not excluded by law, the parties to the contract may agree to deviate from the above, in particular with regard to partial payments, adjustments of interest and/or repayment instalments or debt restructuring. The lender should offer the borrower a discussion about the possibility of a mutual agreement and about available support measures. If no mutual agreement is reached for the period after 30 June 2020, the term of the agreement shall be extended by three months. The respective due dates of contractual obligations will be postponed by this period.
Default Interest, Collection Costs, Contractual Penalties
For all contractual relations, default interest on payments due in the period from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020 shall be limited in amount to the statutory interest rate in accordance with sec 1000 para 1 of the Austrian General Civil Code (ABGB) (ie 4%, unless otherwise provided for by law) if a debtor (fully or partly) fails to make such payment because his/her economic capacity is significantly impaired as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the debtor is not obliged to reimburse the costs of any extrajudicial collection or recovery measures.
The meaning of "for all contractual relations" (as mentioned above) remains unclear. According to the legislative documents, above provision applies to all types of contracts (ie, does not refer to specific types of contracts as in the case of the above-mentioned rules on residential rental agreements or loan agreements). However, the precondition of a significant impairment of the debtor's economic capacity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic raises the question as to whether the legislator wanted to limit the applicability of this provision to contracts with consumers or micro-enterprises as well. Neither the 4th COVID-19 Act nor the respective explanatory notes provide a compelling answer to this question.
Additionally, contractual penalties need not be paid if, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the debtor is either significantly impaired in his/her economic capacity or is unable to perform the underlying obligation due to restrictions on the working life.
TAXES AND STAMP DUTIES
COVID-19 Grants and Bonus Payments
The Austrian Income Tax Act (Einkommenssteuergesetz) now expressly clarifies that grants from the COVID-19 Crisis Management Fund or the Hardship Fund as well as comparable grants from the states, municipalities or statutory interest groups made to overcome the COVID-19 crisis are tax-free. However, certain refunds (such as the fixed cost subsidy) reduce the deductible expenses in the financial year in question.
Bonuses or supplements granted to employees for their work during the COVID-19 crisis are tax-free up to an amount of 3,000 euros in the calendar year 2020, but only if the bonuses or supplements are paid exclusively because of the COVID-19 crisis, ie if they were not granted before.
The allowance for commuters will be continued to be granted, even if the employee is temporarily working from home or is on temporary short-time work.
The (first) COVID-19 Act introduced an exemption from stamp duties for all writings and official acts that are directly or indirectly based on the necessary measures in connection with the management of the COVID-19 crisis (see Update of 20 March 2020). This provision was supplemented by the 3rd COVID-19 Act and now also exempts all legal transactions, which are necessary for the implementation of measures in connection with the management of the COVID-19 crisis, from the relevant stamp duties.
According to the explanatory notes, this is intended in particular to exempt sureties which, as a measure to deal with the COVID-19 crisis, shall ensure the liquidity of concerned companies; in addition, eg rental agreements which are concluded by local authorities or aid organisations to ensure medical care in Austria are exempt as well.
However, according to the wording of the Act, the exemptions could probably also cover other (security) transactions entered into to secure liquidity in the current situation (eg security assignments or mortgages). It is not clear from the explanatory notes whether and, if so, what evidence must be provided for the applicability of the exemption.
Furthermore, the planned increase in court fees has been suspended for the time being.
SOCIAL SECURITY AND EMPLOYMENT LAW
Work Accidents in Home Office
New provisions in the Austrian General Social Security Act (ASVG) stipulate that accidents occurring in home office are considered to be work accidents, regardless of whether the employee is working from a dedicated study room or not. However, the provisions are limited to the period of the COVID-19 crisis and apply only to events that occurred after 11 March 2020.
Special Care Leave
According to the 3rd COVID-19 Act, the employee and employer may also agree on a special care leave if the employee has to take care of a relative whose 24-hour-carer is not available. In this case, one third of the wage costs of the employee are covered by federal funds. The model is limited in time, any form of special care leave can only be taken until the end of May 2020, and the employer's claim for remuneration from federal funds must be processed by the end of June 2021.
PROCEDURES AND DEADLINES
In insolvency proceedings, it is no longer possible to have procedural deadlines interrupted so that proceedings can be completed quickly. Interrupted procedural deadlines commence anew once the 4th COVID-19 Act comes into force. However, in the event of over-indebtedness, the debtor's obligation to file for insolvency remains suspended until 30 June 2020. During this period, the personal liability of members of the management board of stock corporations in respect of payments that are made after the company has become over-indebted will also cease to apply.
Additionally, it is possible to have payment schedule instalments modified, taking in consideration the current situation, and to request deferrals for period of up to nine months.
Equity Substitution Laws
From the day the 4th COVID-19 Act has come into force until 30 June 2020, a loan granted to a company by its shareholder for no more than 120 days, and for which the company does not provide a pledge or comparable security from its assets, does not constitute a loan within the meaning of sec 1 of the Austrian Equity Substitution Act (EKEG) and is therefore not considered to be an equity substitution. This provision is intended to temporarily facilitate a quick and unbureaucratic bridging of short-term liquidity bottlenecks by a shareholder loan. The provision is limited to unsecured shareholder loans in order not to shift too much of the risk that such restructuring fails to any potential insolvency creditors.
Financial Market Authority
The Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) can extend various statutory terms, such as regarding reporting, publication and information obligations, upon reasoned request or ex officio.
Beneficial Owners Registry Act
The period for reporting data by legal entities and the period for imposing penalties in accordance with the Austrian Beneficial Owners Registry Act (Wirtschaftliche Eigentümer Registergesetz) will also be interrupted on 16 March 2020 and will commence anew on 1 May 2020, whereby such interruption may be extended by the Federal Minister of Finance, if necessary.
Corporate Law Deadlines and Meetings
As set-out in our Update of 20 March 2020, meetings of shareholders and board members of a corporation, partnership, cooperative, private foundation or association, mutual insurance association or small insurance company can be held without the participants being physically present, as long as the measures related to COVID-19 continue.
In addition, rules deviating from the respective statutory provisions were imposed for periods and dates of meetings of statutory corporate assemblies and supervisory board meetings. Furthermore, the deadline for the submission of documents to the supervisory board by management bodies may now be exceeded by up to four months under certain circumstances. This also applies to other accounting documents that must be submitted within the deadlines applicable to the submission of annual financial statements.
Notarial Deeds and Authenticated Documents
In the area of corporate housekeeping and M&A transactions, the following simplification was introduced: Notarial official acts required for the establishment of a notarial deed or any other public document or certified document can now be carried out using electronic means of communication. This opportunity has been granted by the legislator until 31 December 2020 (at the latest).
Intellectual Property Rights
Deadlines applying to intellectual property protection are suspended from 16 March 2020 to 30 April 2020. Such period is not to be included in the deadlines for filing a request, making a declaration or performing an action under the Austrian Patent Act (Patentgesetz), Austrian Utility Model Act (Gebrauchsmustergesetz), Austrian Trademark Protection Act (Markenschutzgesetz), Austrian Design Protection Act (Musterschutzgesetz), etc. The suspension does not apply to time limits under European law or to administrative time limits, as well as time limits concerning appeals to the Higher Regional Court of Vienna or the Austrian Supreme Court.
Our specialists with the respective expertise are at your disposal.
BEIRA Corona Task Force Update
EU and Austrian Competition Law in Times of COVID-19 – An Overview (as per 09 April 2020)
Currently, there is hardly any area not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Competition law is no exception to this. The following overview provides a snapshot of selected competition law topics that may be relevant for undertakings in this time of crisis:
At the European level, the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition ("DG COMP") encourages undertakings, if possible, to postpone their submissions of merger control notifications. DG COMP assumes that it will be more difficult for case teams to obtain information from third parties (such as customers, competitors and suppliers). In addition, DG COMP's staff has worked increasingly from home since 16 March 2020. However, deadlines have so far not been suspended on a general level.
For Austria, the 2nd COVID-19 Act affects the deadlines for merger control proceedings: For notifications received by the Austrian Federal Competition Authority ("FCA") prior to 30 April 2020, the deadline for the FCA and the Federal Cartel Prosecutor to request an in-depth review pursuant to sec 11 of the Austrian Cartel Act (phase I) will only start to run from 1 May 2020. For merger control notifications submitted prior to 21 March 2020 (i.e., prior to the 2nd COVID-19 Act), the FCA stated that the phase I-deadlines remain unaffected by the 2nd COVID-19 Act. For notifications which were or will be filed after 21 March 2020 (for which the period for submitting a request for review to the Cartel Court will not end before 29 May 2020), obtaining early waivers of review from the FCA and the Federal Cartel Prosecutor is still possible.
However, for proceedings in phase II, which were pending before the Cartel Court at the time when the 2nd COVID-19 Act entered into force or which will be put on the Court's docket before 30 April 2020, the decision deadlines for the Cartel Court will only commence on 1 May 2020. This applies regardless of when the respective merger notification was filed with the FCA.
In Germany, the Federal Cartel Office has also called on representatives of companies to consider whether a project should be submitted to the Office at this stage or whether it could possibly be filed at a later stage. However, the deadlines have not yet been formally changed.
Obtaining all necessary merger control clearances will therefore, in many cases, take longer than usual during the COVID-19 crisis. This should be anticipated in ongoing M&A negotiations by adjusting the transaction schedule and affected SPA clauses (such as long stop dates) accordingly.
Personal Meetings and Digital Submissions
The FCA does currently not receive parties or their representatives in person and does not accept any submissions via its front desk. Since the latter is not staffed continuously, the FCA also discourages parties from submitting documents by mail. At least for the time being, merger filings can only be submitted to the FCA by means of the Austrian electronic legal communication system "ERV" (Z008239) during the FCA's office hours (Mon-Thurs 8am-4pm, Fri 8am-3pm). Filings submitted after the FCA's office hours will be considered as having been submitted on the following working day.
At DG COMP it is, in principle, still possible to submit merger notifications in person, but restrictions may occur. DG COMP also accepts notifications by e-mail (firstname.lastname@example.org) or via the eTrustEx system.
Scenarios of Insolvency; Failing Company Defence
The acquisition of companies or parts thereof is still subject to merger control rules, even if insolvency proceedings have been initiated by or are pending against the target company.
If a financially ailing company is to be taken over, the "failing company defence" can be of importance in the substantive assessment conducted during merger control proceedings. This line of argument suggests that the target company is financially so weak that it would exit the market without a takeover, and that the market shares of the target company would then transfer to other market participants. This is the hypothetical scenario to be used when calculating the increase in the acquirer's market share. Essential for arguing the "failing company defence" is that there are no other potential buyers for the target company who would experience a smaller increase in market share, eg because they had not been active on the relevant market so far.
Evidence that the target company would exit the market without a takeover has to be provided to the competition authority during the merger control proceedings. Pending or imminent insolvency proceedings are considered a meaningful indicator.
Temporary Modification of Commitments from Previous Proceedings
If clearances in past merger control proceedings were only granted subject to commitments or conditions, it may be possible to modify or suspend ongoing behavioural commitments during the COVID-19 crisis.
For example, the acquisition of the Austrian TV channel ATV+ by the ProSieben-Sat 1-Puls 4 Group in 2017 was cleared by the Austrian competition authorities subject to commitments, inter alia, to continue their news program "ATV Aktuell" under defined minimum requirements. These commitments also contained a "revision clause" on the basis of which the ProSieben-Sat 1-Puls 4 Group applied, in March 2020, for an amendment to the commitments regarding "News & Information" in order to be able to react to the changed news production situation during the COVID-19 crisis. As a result, the commitments were, until the end of the COVID-19 crisis or 30 April 2020 (whichever date is earlier), suspended in so far as necessary to maintain the operation of the newsroom.
If commitments or obligations were part of a clearance decision by the Cartel Court in Phase II, they can be modified even without an explicit "revision clause" in the commitments themselves: If the relevant circumstances change after such clearance, the Austrian Cartel Act empowers the Cartel Court to modify or withdraw restrictions or obligations at the request of an undertaking concerned.
ABUSE OF DOMINANCE
Controlling the unilateral behaviour of dominant undertakings is also of relevance in the COVID-19 crisis: Not only the above-mentioned acquisition of a failing company may lead to an increase in market shares of the acquirer during and after the crisis. Also, the market exit of undertakings may result in an increase in a competitor's market share to such an extent that the latter could be qualified as dominant for the first time. From this point on, stricter rules would apply to such competitor which rules seek to prevent abusive market behaviour by dominant undertaking. A shortage of certain products can also lead to a dominant position.
The "European Competition Network" ("ECN") published a joint statement by all national competition authorities on 23 March 2020. According to this statement the competition authorities will not hesitate to act against dominant undertakings in relation to products considered essential at this time (eg face masks or sanitiser gel), if they exploit the crisis by unjustifiably increasing prices. Additionally, the FCA announced that it would give priority to investigating any suspicion of excessive prices, artificial supply shortages or other abusive behaviour in the area of health protection products.
AGREEMENTS BETWEEN UNDERTAKINGS
In the EU Member States, including Austria, European and national competition laws continue to apply to agreements between undertakings. However, in its statement of 23 March 2020, the ECN recognised that the current crisis might require extraordinary measures, including cooperation agreements between competitors or between undertakings at different market levels. Taking these circumstances into account does not require any special legislation, but can be accomplished with the existing mechanisms of national and EU competition law. The ECN states that, under the present circumstances, competition authorities will not actively intervene in necessary and temporary measures taken by undertakings to avoid supply shortages.
Also DG COMP acknowledges that businesses are currently facing particular challenges which may call for specific cooperation initiatives in order to overcome the crisis to the ultimate benefit of consumers. In order to swiftly receive informal guidance from DG COMP on the compatibility of such cooperation initiatives with EU antitrust law, undertakings can contact DG COMP via a dedicated email inbox which was newly established on 30 March 2020 (COMP-COVID-ANTITRUST@ec.europa.eu). On 8 April 2020, the Commission issued a "Temporary Framework for assessing antitrust issues related to business cooperation in response to situations of urgency stemming from the current COVID-19 outbreak". The Temporary Framework sets out an exceptional guidance procedure which may result in the Commission issuing even an ad hoc "comfort" letter in relation to "specific and well-defined cooperation projects" with an EU dimension. However, the Temporary Framework does not leave any doubt that providing such guidance due to the exceptional circumstances is subject to DG COMP's own discretion, as undertakings are normally required to make an antitrust assessment at their own risk.
If a cooperation initiative primarily concerns one specific Member State, the national competition authority of the respective Member State would still be the best point of contact.
Futhermore, there might be agreements which are concluded by undertakings only in order to fulfil statutory obligations. Such agreements do not violate competition law. Eg, if the legislator decides that certain products (such as sanitiser gels) may only be sold through certain channels or to certain end customers, an agreement between a supplier and its distributor that reflects this restriction does not contravene applicable competition law. However, such an agreement must not be excessive or stay in effect for longer than the statutory laws it intends to implement.
The crisis may also justify agreements of a different nature, such as exclusive purchase and supply obligations, in particular if they guarantee security of supply. It is important that these agreements are limited to subject matters indispensable to the achievement of such objectives, and that they are terminated immediately once their justification ceases to apply.
Fixing resale prices by imposing either minimum or fixed prices, though, still amounts to a hardcore restriction and cannot be justified by the crisis. However, competition law does give producers the possibility to set maximum prices for their products in order to put a stop to unjustified price increases at downstream market levels – the ECN expressly refers to this possibility in its statement from 23 March 2020.
In the case of agreements between competitors, the crisis may justify measures that would otherwise violate competition law. Necessary and temporary measures may be allowed if they (i) either do not amount to restrictions of competition at all or (ii) produce efficiencies that outweigh the negative effects of the restriction.
An example of such an exception to the ban on anti-competitive agreements are short-term deliveries to a competitor who, without any fault on his part, suffers from a supply bottleneck regarding an input product. This might happen, for example, when borders are suddenly closed. Other possibilities to protect against a supply interruption, such as forming purchasing groups, are also conceivable. However, as the competition law rules remain fully applicable, a careful assessment should be made in each case, weighing the necessity of the envisaged measure against its restrictive effects on competition. Restrictions of competition must be minimised, and the benefits gained from the cooperation must be passed on to the customers.
The Commission's Temporary Framework of 8 April 2020 explains how the Commission will assess cooperation agreements between competitors aimed at addressing the shortage of essential products and services, notably in the health care sector. While such cooperation may require exchange of information that would under non-crisis circumstances be problematic, the Commission indicates that such measures may be acceptable to the extent that they are (i) designed and objectively necessary to actually increase output in the most efficient way, (ii) temporary in nature and (iii) proportional. The fact that cooperation is encouraged/coordinated or even requested by a public authority will also be taken into account.
In this context, howver, it should be noted again that various European national competition authorities, including the Commission, announced that they are focusing on certain areas that are currently prone to prohibited horizontal agreements, such as price fixing for goods in particularly high demand. The Austrian FCA has announced that it will investigate any suspicion of cartel agreements in the area of health protection products (such as face masks or sanitiser gels) and give top priority to such complaints.
Austrian and EU competition law remain fully applicable in this time of crisis.
Competition authorities in Austria and elsewhere have declared that they will focus their market monitoring efforts on certain goods which are currently in particularly high demand (e.g. protective masks or sanitiser gels) and that they will give priority to prosecuting competition law violations affecting these areas. At the same time, applicable competition rules give undertakings a room for manoeuvre to react to the crisis with special measures – even if this requires agreements with competitors.
With regard to merger control, delays must be expected throughout, notwithstanding that the FCA and other competition authorities switched to digital communication channels for the purpose of submitting merger control notifications. In insolvency scenarios the merger control rules remain applicable, but the "Failing Company Defence" may lead to (fast) clearance by the authorities.
Regardless of whether measures could qualify as restrictive agreements, abuse of a dominant position or require merger control: even during the COVID-19 crisis, undertakings should carefully examine every action that might infringe applicable competition law.
Contact: Isabella Hartung, E: email@example.com